State College
Bird Club Zoom Meeting
March 23, 2022
Presiding: Doug Wentzel
Recording: Peggy Wagoner Saporito
Attendance: 35
Meeting Format: Zoom (due to Covid)
Treasurer’s report:(Jean Miller): Deposited: $185 from dues
and hats. Expenses: $50 for speaker and $252 for second order of
hats.
Bird Club Field Trips: (Susan Smith)
This month’s field trip is coming up on Saturday March 26. Joe
Gyekis will lead us on the downtown State College Tree Walk.
Details for all of this spring’s SCBC field trips can be found on
our website.
Other Activities:
Weekly Bird Walks at Millbrook Marsh Nature Center
continue each Tuesday (8-9:30AM) through April 26. Joe Gyekis,
Julia Plummer and Susan Smith are each leading walks. See website:
https://www.crpr.org/millbrook-marsh-nature-center
Shaver’s Creek Environmental Center Birding Cup will take
place May 6-7 and Migration Morning Walks begin at the
Center on April 6 (7:00-8:30AM) continuing weekly through May 11.
Registration is appreciated, but not required. See website: https://www.shaverscreek.org/public-programs-and-events/
Announcements:
A few SCBC logo hats are still available. If interested in
purchasing one, contact Susan
Smith.
Board member elections will be held at our regular April
meeting. The nominating committee, Nick Kerlin, Greg Grove and
Roana Fuller, is looking to fill positions for Treasurer, VP of
Field Trips and 2 at large Board seats. Anyone interested in
running, please contact members on the nominating committee.
Old Crow Wetland: Decisions about development of Rutters
filling station above the wetland are reaching a critical phase.
Last week at a regular meeting of the Huntingdon County planning
committee, 20 supporters of Old Crow Wetland voiced their
concerns, while Rutter’s representatives only briefly discussed
their plans. This county committee only has an advisory role and
does not make the final decision. The critical meeting of the
Smithfield Planning Commission will take place on Tuesday, March
29. It is important that a large crowd opposing Rutter’s
development come to this meeting in an effort to stop the proposed
development. Greg Grove will send out more details on the
listserv, but he is hoping that as many people come as possible to
stand in support of the wetland and against the development. The
township supervisors will be making a decision as early as the
first week of April, so now is the time to show support for the
wetland. For more information contact Greg
Grove.
If you are curious about the listserv instructions, you
may visit our website https://www.scbirdcl.org/joinemaillist.html.
These instructions include a “digest” option which limits the
daily emails from the group to a maximum of one per day. We are
entering the “busy” season as we share first of year (FOY) birds
we encounter and news on field trips etc.
Tussey Mountain Spring Hawk Watch
The migration count is well underway with close to 150 golden
eagles and nearly 100 red tails tallied so far this season. Other
species are making their way north and will be seen as spring
progresses. Thanks to Gillian Martin for keeping us up to date on
the count through the listserv each day. For details and the
latest news you can also visit the website: https://tusseymountainspringhawkwatch.org/
Notable Bird Sightings: Greg Grove’s Summary
(Feb 24-March 23, 2022; Centre and its contiguous counties)
March is the month of ducks moving though our region. Long-tailed
ducks and horned grebes were among the more unusual sightings. A
Sandhill crane was in the area in mid-March. American
woodcocks, common snipe and killdeer have been arriving and a
greater yellowlegs was seen in early March. A lesser black-backed
gull and white pelican were among the unusual species reported.
Sadly, a dead red-throated loon was found on the road near Julian,
probably a casualty of mistaking a wet road for a body of water as
can be the case with loons. Only one shrike was recorded. The
first purple martin return was recorded on March 21 and tree
swallows are arriving now. A couple of early brown thrashers were
seen and the 3 reports of catbirds are probably those that have
remained here throughout the winter. Only a few cross-bills and
pine siskins have been sighted since this has not been an
irruption year. Lapland longspur and Harris sparrow have been
reported. The orange-crowned warbler seen throughout the winter in
State College continues. The first early warbler migrants include
pine warblers and the first Louisiana waterthrush was reported a
few days ago.
Speaker: Bruna Amaral: “Small bug, big impact: effects of
hemlock woolly adelgid infestation on bird populations”.
(This entire presentation can be viewed at:
https://psu.zoom.us/rec/share/MCcjye5_Fx2FZk32r_8FbEUpYBwFErmsjwFcftKnkYurbMuebg67yKIsN2-VyY2_.OX1txUZx1IYVHuIY
)
As a quantitative ecologist using statistics to understand birds’
response to habitat change, Bruna received her undergraduate
degree in biology in Brazil, where she studied how understory
birds in the Amazon rainforest are coping with second-growth
forests. Currently pursuing her master's degree in ecology at Penn
State, Bruna creatively presented her research, using entertaining
and informative graphics. Her work helps to address the question:
do landscape changes caused by adelgid infestation and subsequent
hemlock mortality contribute to the loss of an estimated 170
million Eastern forest birds since 1970?
Bruna first discussed several examples of human mediated
biological invasions, both intentional such as Starlings into the
US and hippos into Columbia and accidental which includes the
hemlock woolly adelgid (HWA).
The HWA, a small aphid-like insect accidentally introduced from
Japan in 1950, feeds on sap of hemlocks and can cause tree death
within 4-10 years after initial infestation. Temperatures
influence the adelgids ability to infest and ultimately kill
hemlocks. Higher mortality of adelgid occurs in colder
temperatures found in the north with more than 90% HWA mortality
in locations north of about 42 degrees latitude. Consequently,
hemlock stands in the north are more protected from adelgid caused
mortality than those in the southern parts of the hemlock’s range.
Hemlock stands provide a cool, dark, humid, relatively open
habitat under their canopies providing an important habitat to a
variety of bird, amphibian and fish species. Many studies have
looked at the negative impact of adelgid infestation and
subsequent hemlock death on local bird populations. Because
scale matters in ecological processes, Bruna’s study considers the
large regional scale including all of the counties in the Eastern
US where hemlocks are present.
To conduct her analysis, Bruna used several large data sources
including US Forest Service data tracking adelgid infestations
from 1951-2017, Breeding Bird Surveys (BBS) since 1966 and
WorldClim temperature data. By overlapping these data sets, more
than 1.5 million detections of birds from almost 800 BBS routes
collected over 40 years were used in this study.
Bruna was able to compare bird population trends from adelgid
infested and uninfested areas. She studied seven hemlock
associated species (Acadian flycatcher, Blackburnian and magnolia
warblers, blue-headed vireo, red-breasted nuthatch and hermit
thrush) and compared them to eight control species (blue jay,
cerulean and worm-eating warblers, eastern phoebe, red-eyed vireo,
scarlet tanager, white breasted nuthatch, and wood thrush) that
are not highly associated with hemlock habitats. She considered
immediate as well as long term impacts of adelgid infestation on
bird populations.
Three of seven hemlock associate species showed significant
decline 20 years after adelgid infestation. Hermit thrush and
Blackburnian warbler exhibited large long term population
declines. Red-breasted nuthatch exhibited both immediate and
long-term population decline but their overall decline was less
dramatic.
Response time of population decline after initial infestation
ranged from 2-8 years. Hermit thrush and red-breasted nuthatch
declines began 2 years after infestation and Blackburnian warbler
declines began 8 years after.
As expected, among the control species studied, none showed
decline after adelgid infestation. However populations of three
species, scarlet tanager, white-breasted nuthatch and cerulean
warbler, increased after adelgid infestation. These species may
benefit from habitat changes due to death of hemlocks and
subsequent increase in deciduous growth.
Populations of four hemlock associated species, (black-throated
green and magnolia warblers, Acadian flycatcher and blue-headed
vireo) were relatively unaffected by adelgid invasion. Populations
of these four initially declined in response to adelgid
infestation, but after 20 years, their populations recovered. In
fact, magnolia warbler populations increased significantly after
20 years. Apparently these four species compensated for loss of
hemlocks by using alternate habitats that include other conifer
species such as spruce and pines. Apparently, habitat
heterogeneity is buffering against some bird species population
decline.
By looking at the large scale, ecological studies such as this one
can take into account surrounding landscapes. This can help us
understand population dynamics and explain why some hemlock
associated species did not decline after adelgid infestation.
In conclusion, this study points to the importance of protecting a
diversity of habitats to ensure species persistence. In addition,
considering scale in ecological studies is important.
Population decline at the landscape scale appears to be less
dramatic than is shown in studies at a more local scale due to
birds using alternative habitat. However, some species did
decline. And bird population decline in warmer areas is greater
due to increase infestation and subsequent hemlock mortality.
Higher latitudes are currently protected against adelgid spread
due to prolonged cold winter temperature. However, global climate
change could negatively impact hemlock stands and bird populations
in northern regions as temperatures rise.